Older files are archived on the platter. Operating System files move back and forth.
Ask Mac 911
The agents find that every part has a life time of ten years, but one part called the kingpin is in excellent shape. Ford weakened the kingpin because having it last longer than the rest of the car was a waste of money. It's a real puzzle why Apple chose to go this way. There's certainly no advantage to users.
What they get out of it is anybody's guess. The old saying applies, caveat emptor—buyer beware. If you think Apple won't screw you over, you're naive.
This is not "borderline deceptive" at all! What's the problem?! Apple doesn't have enough billions to equip their mainstream desktop computer with storage options that don't cripple its performance? They did the same thing when they first introduced the super-thin iMac design. My iMac, which had a rpm HD, was faster than my iMac, which had a rpm drive that was clearly not up to the task of running the machine at its full potential. Making money is one thing, but living to make money is quite another!
Upgrade Mac Mini HDD and SSD (ordered as fusion drive)?
Compromising the quality of your products in order to make more money is disgusting! Years ago, I would never have believed that Apple would ever do that. But now here we are! I would have thought that it would be a lot faster than my own MacBook Pro, but it was not. Was, because it was stolen two months ago. I'll pay attention when I buy its successor, I'll happily shell out a bit more money from my work account if that can guarantee faster reaction times. Tidbits could usefully publish a piece about how to add a fusion drive to a desktop Mac.
I'd like to, but don't know how, and it seems to be non-trivial. It is very non-trivial. Besides the fact that cracking open an iMac requires serious expertise, creating a fusion drive with an SSD and an HDD requires non-rtivial skills in Terminal. You can find out how to do it by doing a search on the Web—there have been article published on the subject.
It's a topic for serious propeller-heads, which is to say, not me. A bit off-topic here: In fact there is, but it's on a second SSD with I assume that all models, at least for , got the Possibly I could "unfused" the two, but so far have avoided looking into this. In any event, it seems that if you have any sort of fusion disk then find my Mac won't work. I would have expected Apple to make that seamless.
I'd think that the recovery partition would be on the hard disk portion, since it would be so infrequently used. You can add the Recovery Partition to the internal drive with third party utilities like Carbon Copy Cloner free demo. Are your two SSDs set up as a fusion drive? It doesn't seem so from what you say. In any case, you can't extrapolate about Fusion Drives given you rather unique configuration. Offloading it to another drive is an unusual arrangement to say the least.
You could back up your system, them wipe the SSD and do a clean install. Then migrate the system from the backup. That's if Find My Mac is important enough to you to go to that much trouble. I haven't actually tried to use it since I don't have an iPhone. But it is enabled. Talk about a disgrace: The internal drive now serves as a backup. Maybe they use slow HDs because of heating and reliability reasons?
Those iMacs are so thin.. I too am disgusted that Apple cost-cuts on this essential component of computer performance to the extent that it undermines the whole experience. We are not talking about bargain basement hardware price wise yet Apple supplies rpm drives, or provides a sliver of SSD for fusion. Once a great advocate for Apple, my adour has decidedly cooled. I still appreciate their ecosystem as it works for me. However, I refuse to pay exhorbitant dollars for new hardware options that should be part of the default config.
Instead I buy 2nd hand Macs that I can upgrade e. And all these fly with SSD. Unfortunately this strategy won't work long term so I live in hope that Apple will one day will provide desktop hardware that isn't fundamentally compromised at default configurations. Holy Cow! Share Facebook Twitter Reddit. Email Address. Adam Engst.
- Apple Footer?
- Latest in-depth reviews!
- Mac mini Late 2014 Hard Drive Replacement.
That would be a freaky problem, but it doesn't sound unreasonable. Gary Schroeder. Dave Devine. SSD only. If so, will I notice a lot of speed difference? I'm working with large photo files in Lightroom and other software. At the moment, around 1Tb is used. My gut feeling says number 1 is possible But I'm not completely sure, so maybe you can tell me. I'm not sure I'll do this right now enough speed now, but maybe somewhere in the future , and I'll certainly not doing any of this by myself!
Required parts may be ordered here. And, depending on which iMac you are upgrading, you will find an instruction video here. Before considering this any further, have you looked into the work that would be involved to physically replace the SSD drive? It does not appear to be a trivial task.
Replace Fusion Drive with SSD only?: Mac Talk Forum: Digital Photography Review
I hope 1 is possible. While it could be suggested that having "everything" SSD doesn't speed up the overall experience that much or that SSD drives do have some "long-out there" lifetime limits, my thought is that the Fusion Drive is a solution well paid its sell-by date, as SSD storage keeps going down and down in price. I use the Seagate hybrids quite a bit, but the fact that they haven't matured into incorporating greater amounts of flash component tells me that SSD-only is the future. The power and heat aspects of SDD compared to spinning drives are extremely attractive for smaller, enclosed devices.
NAS, servers and surveillance devices may have different requirements that spinning drives fulfill well. Thank you Billiam! As I said in my original post, I do not even consider doing this myself I don't dare to.
Worlds of difference. However, when comparing her all SSD to my fusion drive machine there is not all that much difference. Hers is faster, but not by much. You need an adaptor to go from 3. While some work that you and me would outsource , certainly doable and mostlylost has already linked to a supplier of the needed parts. In regard to speed, you should notice foremost more consistency. With a Fusion drive, things are fast most of the time but then for some things the disk access slows down considerably.
Which brings us back to speed being more consistently fast even if a bit slower for some things. As already linked to, it's possible, but I don't know of any vendor selling the required part as Apple tends to use custom connectors for its PCIe SSDs. This would not be easy, as the HDD bay is not designed to be user-serviceable — but it would be possible. That depends on the availability of larger SSD sticks.
Both advertise 2. So unless some other vendor has a lead on parts that these two do not — or you could get an Authorized Apple Repair Facility to sell you one of the larger SSD sticks originally used to build Late SSD-only iMacs — the answer is probably "No.
Getting the part would only be part of the battle. If larger sticks were available, you'd still need to.
Replace Fusion Drive with SSD only?
Before considering this any further, have you [the OP] looked into the work that would be involved to physically replace the SSD drive? An external SSD might be the way to go. Late iMacs have Thunderbolt 1. Get a bus-powered, tool-free, USB 3. No major surgery required. If it is a non-Apple Fusion drive i. So you had better make a backup, before you do this. Thank you Bondiblue! Enough said; I will not even try this. Sounds awfully complicated. I think, the best option is to wait and buy an "all SSD"- iMac in 1 or 2 3?
Latest sample galleries
No, this is not true. Stop spreading false information. People split Fusion drives often. I have never read of heard of anyone corrupting a drive by doing it. I hope you aren't one of those folks that actually beeves anything at all that comes from the mouth of that blackman in Our White House - DickJenkinns.
The EF-M 32mm F1. Find out what's new, what it's like to use and how it compares to its peers in our review in progress. The S1 and S1R are Panasonic's first full-frame mirrorless cameras so there's a plenty to talk about. We've taken a look at the design and features of both cameras and have some initial impressions, as well. Here's the one we recommend Aimed at sports shooters it promises improved AF, including advanced subject recognition, along with the highest-ever rated image stabilization system. If you're looking for a high-quality camera, you don't need to spend a ton of cash, nor do you need to buy the latest and greatest new product on the market.
In our latest buying guide we've selected some cameras that while they're a bit older, still offer a lot of bang for the buck. These entry level cameras should be easy to use, offer good image quality and easily connect with a smartphone for sharing.